Class · High

CWE-1038: Insecure Automated Optimizations

The product uses a mechanism that automatically optimizes code, e.g. to improve a characteristic such as performance, but the optimizations can have an unintended side effect that might violate an int...

CWE-1038 · Class Level ·2 CVEs

Description

The product uses a mechanism that automatically optimizes code, e.g. to improve a characteristic such as performance, but the optimizations can have an unintended side effect that might violate an intended security assumption.

Potential Impact

Integrity

Alter Execution Logic

Demonstrative Examples

The following code reads a password from the user, uses the password to connect to a back-end mainframe, and then attempts to scrub the password from memory using memset().
Bad
void GetData(char *MFAddr) {
				 
				   char pwd[64];
				   if (GetPasswordFromUser(pwd, sizeof(pwd))) {
				   
					 if (ConnectToMainframe(MFAddr, pwd)) {
					 
					   // Interaction with mainframe
					 
					 }
				   
				   }
				   memset(pwd, 0, sizeof(pwd));
                 
				 }
The code in the example will behave correctly if it is executed verbatim, but if the code is compiled using an optimizing compiler, then the call to memset() might be removed as a dead store, because the buffer pwd is not used after its value is overwritten. Because the buffer pwd contains a sensitive value, the application may be vulnerable to attack if the data are left memory resident. If attackers are able to access the correct region of memory, they may use the recovered password to gain control of the system.
It is common practice to overwrite sensitive data manipulated in memory, such as passwords or cryptographic keys, in order to prevent attackers from learning system secrets. However, with the advent of optimizing compilers, programs do not always behave as their source code alone would suggest. In the example, the compiler interprets the call to memset() as dead code because the memory being written to is not subsequently used, despite the fact that there is clearly a security motivation for the operation to occur. The problem here is that many compilers, and in fact many programming languages, do not take this and other security concerns into consideration in their efforts to improve efficiency.
Attackers typically exploit this type of vulnerability by using a core dump or runtime mechanism to access the memory used by a particular application and recover the secret information. Once an attacker has access to the secret information, it is relatively straightforward to further exploit the system and possibly compromise other resources with which the application interacts.

Real-World CVE Examples

CVE IDDescription
CVE-2017-5715Intel, ARM, and AMD processor optimizations related to speculative execution and branch prediction cause access control checks to be bypassed when placing data into the cache. Often known as "Spectre"
CVE-2008-1685C compiler optimization, as allowed by specifications, removes code that is used to perform checks to detect integer overflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-1038?

CWE-1038 (Insecure Automated Optimizations) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Class-level weakness. The product uses a mechanism that automatically optimizes code, e.g. to improve a characteristic such as performance, but the optimizations can have an unintended side effect that might violate an int...

How can CWE-1038 be exploited?

Attackers can exploit CWE-1038 (Insecure Automated Optimizations) to alter execution logic. This weakness is typically introduced during the Architecture and Design phase of software development.

How do I prevent CWE-1038?

Follow secure coding practices, conduct code reviews, and use automated security testing tools (SAST/DAST) to detect this weakness early in the development lifecycle.

What is the severity of CWE-1038?

CWE-1038 is classified as a Class-level weakness (High abstraction). It has been observed in 2 real-world CVEs.