Description
The product implements a decoding mechanism to decode certain bus-transaction signals to security identifiers. If the decoding is implemented incorrectly, then untrusted agents can now gain unauthorized access to the asset.
In a System-On-Chip (SoC), various integrated circuits and hardware engines generate transactions such as to access (reads/writes) assets or perform certain actions (e.g., reset, fetch, compute, etc.). Among various types of message information, a typical transaction is comprised of source identity (to identify the originator of the transaction) and a destination identity (to route the transaction to the respective entity). Sometimes the transactions are qualified with a security identifier. The security identifier helps the destination agent decide on the set of allowed actions (e.g., access an asset for read and writes). A decoder decodes the bus transactions to map security identifiers into necessary access-controls/protections. A common weakness that can exist in this scenario is incorrect decoding because an untrusted agent's security identifier is decoded into a trusted agent's security identifier. Thus, an untrusted agent previously without access to an asset can now gain access to the asset.
Potential Impact
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control
Modify Memory, Read Memory, DoS: Resource Consumption (Other), Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Quality Degradation
Demonstrative Examples
If (AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY[Security_Identifier] == "1")
Allow access to AES-Key registers
Else
Deny access to AES-Key registersIf (Bus_transaction[14] == "1")
Security_Identifier == "1"
Else
Security_Identifier == "0"If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "00")
Security_Identifier == "0"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "01")
Security_Identifier == "1"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "10")
Security_Identifier == "2"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "11")
Security_Identifier == "3"Mitigations & Prevention
Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses.
Access and programming flows must be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing in order to check for this weakness.
Related Weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CWE-1290?
CWE-1290 (Incorrect Decoding of Security Identifiers) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Base-level weakness. The product implements a decoding mechanism to decode certain bus-transaction signals to security identifiers. If the decoding is implemented incorrectly, then untrusted agents can now gain unauthoriz...
How can CWE-1290 be exploited?
Attackers can exploit CWE-1290 (Incorrect Decoding of Security Identifiers) to modify memory, read memory, dos: resource consumption (other), execute unauthorized code or commands, gain privileges or assume identity, quality degradation. This weakness is typically introduced during the Implementation, Architecture and Design phase of software development.
How do I prevent CWE-1290?
Key mitigations include: Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses.
What is the severity of CWE-1290?
CWE-1290 is classified as a Base-level weakness (Medium abstraction). Its actual severity depends on the specific context and how the weakness manifests in your application.