Description
The product does not drop privileges before passing control of a resource to an actor that does not have those privileges.
In some contexts, a system executing with elevated permissions will hand off a process/file/etc. to another process or user. If the privileges of an entity are not reduced, then elevated privileges are spread throughout a system and possibly to an attacker.
Potential Impact
Access Control
Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Access Control, Non-Repudiation
Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Hide Activities
Demonstrative Examples
chroot(APP_HOME);chdir("/");FILE* data = fopen(argv[1], "r+");...Mitigations & Prevention
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
Real-World CVE Examples
| CVE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2000-1213 | Program does not drop privileges after acquiring the raw socket. |
| CVE-2001-0559 | Setuid program does not drop privileges after a parsing error occurs, then calls another program to handle the error. |
| CVE-2001-0787 | Does not drop privileges in related groups when lowering privileges. |
| CVE-2002-0080 | Does not drop privileges in related groups when lowering privileges. |
| CVE-2001-1029 | Does not drop privileges before determining access to certain files. |
| CVE-1999-0813 | Finger daemon does not drop privileges when executing programs on behalf of the user being fingered. |
| CVE-1999-1326 | FTP server does not drop privileges if a connection is aborted during file transfer. |
| CVE-2000-0172 | Program only uses seteuid to drop privileges. |
| CVE-2004-2504 | Windows program running as SYSTEM does not drop privileges before executing other programs (many others like this, especially involving the Help facility). |
| CVE-2004-0213 | Utility Manager launches winhlp32.exe while running with raised privileges, which allows local users to gain system privileges. |
| CVE-2004-0806 | Setuid program does not drop privileges before executing program specified in an environment variable. |
| CVE-2004-0828 | Setuid program does not drop privileges before processing file specified on command line. |
| CVE-2004-2070 | Service on Windows does not drop privileges before using "view file" option, allowing code execution. |
Related Weaknesses
Taxonomy Mappings
- PLOVER: — Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CWE-271?
CWE-271 (Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Class-level weakness. The product does not drop privileges before passing control of a resource to an actor that does not have those privileges.
How can CWE-271 be exploited?
Attackers can exploit CWE-271 (Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors) to gain privileges or assume identity. This weakness is typically introduced during the Architecture and Design, Implementation, Operation phase of software development.
How do I prevent CWE-271?
Key mitigations include: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfaci
What is the severity of CWE-271?
CWE-271 is classified as a Class-level weakness (High abstraction). It has been observed in 13 real-world CVEs.