Compound · Complex

CWE-384: Session Fixation

Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.

CWE-384 · Compound Level ·1 CVEs ·3 Mitigations

Description

Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.

Such a scenario is commonly observed when: In the generic exploit of session fixation vulnerabilities, an attacker creates a new session on a web application and records the associated session identifier. The attacker then causes the victim to associate, and possibly authenticate, against the server using that session identifier, giving the attacker access to the user's account through the active session.

Potential Impact

Access Control

Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

Demonstrative Examples

The following example shows a snippet of code from a J2EE web application where the application authenticates users with LoginContext.login() without first calling HttpSession.invalidate().
Bad
private void auth(LoginContext lc, HttpSession session) throws LoginException {...lc.login();...}
In order to exploit the code above, an attacker could first create a session (perhaps by logging into the application) from a public terminal, record the session identifier assigned by the application, and reset the browser to the login page. Next, a victim sits down at the same public terminal, notices the browser open to the login page of the site, and enters credentials to authenticate against the application. The code responsible for authenticating the victim continues to use the pre-existing session identifier, now the attacker simply uses the session identifier recorded earlier to access the victim's active session, providing nearly unrestricted access to the victim's account for the lifetime of the session. Even given a vulnerable application, the success of the specific attack described here is dependent on several factors working in the favor of the attacker: access to an unmonitored public terminal, the ability to keep the compromised session active and a victim interested in logging into the vulnerable application on the public terminal.
In most circumstances, the first two challenges are surmountable given a sufficient investment of time. Finding a victim who is both using a public terminal and interested in logging into the vulnerable application is possible as well, so long as the site is reasonably popular. The less well known the site is, the lower the odds of an interested victim using the public terminal and the lower the chance of success for the attack vector described above. The biggest challenge an attacker faces in exploiting session fixation vulnerabilities is inducing victims to authenticate against the vulnerable application using a session identifier known to the attacker.
In the example above, the attacker did this through a direct method that is not subtle and does not scale suitably for attacks involving less well-known web sites. However, do not be lulled into complacency; attackers have many tools in their belts that help bypass the limitations of this attack vector. The most common technique employed by attackers involves taking advantage of cross-site scripting or HTTP response splitting vulnerabilities in the target site [12]. By tricking the victim into submitting a malicious request to a vulnerable application that reflects JavaScript or other code back to the victim's browser, an attacker can create a cookie that will cause the victim to reuse a session identifier controlled by the attacker. It is worth noting that cookies are often tied to the top level domain associated with a given URL. If multiple applications reside on the same top level domain, such as bank.example.com and recipes.example.com, a vulnerability in one application can allow an attacker to set a cookie with a fixed session identifier that will be used in all interactions with any application on the domain example.com [29].
The following example shows a snippet of code from a J2EE web application where the application authenticates users with a direct post to the <code>j_security_check</code>, which typically does not invalidate the existing session before processing the login request.
Bad
<form method="POST" action="j_security_check"><input type="text" name="j_username"><input type="text" name="j_password"></form>

Mitigations & Prevention

Architecture and Design

Invalidate any existing session identifiers prior to authorizing a new user session.

Architecture and Design

For platforms such as ASP that do not generate new values for sessionid cookies, utilize a secondary cookie. In this approach, set a secondary cookie on the user's browser to a random value and set a session variable to the same value. If the session variable and the cookie value ever don't match, invalidate the session, and force the user to log on again.

Operation Moderate

Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

Real-World CVE Examples

CVE IDDescription
CVE-2022-2820Website software for game servers does not proprerly terminate user sessions, allowing for possible session fixation

Taxonomy Mappings

  • 7 Pernicious Kingdoms: — Session Fixation
  • OWASP Top Ten 2004: A3 — Broken Authentication and Session Management
  • WASC: 37 — Session Fixation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-384?

CWE-384 (Session Fixation) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Compound-level weakness. Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.

How can CWE-384 be exploited?

Attackers can exploit CWE-384 (Session Fixation) to gain privileges or assume identity. This weakness is typically introduced during the Architecture and Design, Implementation phase of software development.

How do I prevent CWE-384?

Key mitigations include: Invalidate any existing session identifiers prior to authorizing a new user session.

What is the severity of CWE-384?

CWE-384 is classified as a Compound-level weakness (Complex abstraction). It has been observed in 1 real-world CVEs.