Description
The product uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the product does not also use a salt as part of the input.
This makes it easier for attackers to pre-compute the hash value using dictionary attack techniques such as rainbow tables. It should be noted that, despite common perceptions, the use of a good salt with a hash does not sufficiently increase the effort for an attacker who is targeting an individual password, or who has a large amount of computing resources available, such as with cloud-based services or specialized, inexpensive hardware. Offline password cracking can still be effective if the hash function is not expensive to compute; many cryptographic functions are designed to be efficient and can be vulnerable to attacks using massive computing resources, even if the hash is cryptographically strong. The use of a salt only slightly increases the computing requirements for an attacker compared to other strategies such as adaptive hash functions. See CWE-916 for more details.
Potential Impact
Access Control
Bypass Protection Mechanism, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Demonstrative Examples
unsigned char *check_passwd(char *plaintext) {ctext = simple_digest("sha1",plaintext,strlen(plaintext), ... );
//Login if hash matches stored hash
if (equal(ctext, secret_password())) {login_user();}}String plainText = new String(plainTextIn);MessageDigest encer = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA");encer.update(plainTextIn);byte[] digest = password.digest();
//Login if hash matches stored hash
if (equal(digest,secret_password())) {login_user();}def storePassword(userName,Password):hasher = hashlib.new('md5')hasher.update(Password)hashedPassword = hasher.digest()
# UpdateUserLogin returns True on success, False otherwise
return updateUserLogin(userName,hashedPassword)def storePassword(userName,Password):hasher = hashlib.new('md5',b'SaltGoesHere')hasher.update(Password)hashedPassword = hasher.digest()
# UpdateUserLogin returns True on success, False otherwise
return updateUserLogin(userName,hashedPassword)Mitigations & Prevention
Use an adaptive hash function that can be configured to change the amount of computational effort needed to compute the hash, such as the number of iterations ("stretching") or the amount of memory required. Some hash functions perform salting automatically. These functions can significantly increase the overhead for a brute force attack compared to intentionally-fast functions such as MD5. For example, rainbow table attacks can become infeasible due to the high computing overhead. Finally, sinc
If a technique that requires extra computational effort can not be implemented, then for each password that is processed, generate a new random salt using a strong random number generator with unpredictable seeds. Add the salt to the plaintext password before hashing it. When storing the hash, also store the salt. Do not use the same salt for every password.
When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
Detection Methods
- Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Manual Static Analysis - Source Code High — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Automated Static Analysis - Source Code High — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Automated Static Analysis SOAR Partial — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Architecture or Design Review High — According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Real-World CVE Examples
| CVE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2008-1526 | Router does not use a salt with a hash, making it easier to crack passwords. |
| CVE-2006-1058 | Router does not use a salt with a hash, making it easier to crack passwords. |
Related Weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CWE-759?
CWE-759 (Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Variant-level weakness. The product uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the product does not also use a salt as part of the input.
How can CWE-759 be exploited?
Attackers can exploit CWE-759 (Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt) to bypass protection mechanism, gain privileges or assume identity. This weakness is typically introduced during the Implementation phase of software development.
How do I prevent CWE-759?
Key mitigations include: Use an adaptive hash function that can be configured to change the amount of computational effort needed to compute the hash, such as the number of iterations ("stretching") or the amount of memory re
What is the severity of CWE-759?
CWE-759 is classified as a Variant-level weakness (Low-Medium abstraction). It has been observed in 2 real-world CVEs.