Variant · Low-Medium

CWE-87: Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controlled input for alternate script syntax.

CWE-87 · Variant Level ·1 CVEs ·5 Mitigations

Description

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controlled input for alternate script syntax.

Potential Impact

Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability

Read Application Data, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

Demonstrative Examples

In the following example, an XSS neutralization method intends to replace script tags in user-supplied input with a safe equivalent:
Bad
public String preventXSS(String input, String mask) {return input.replaceAll("script", mask);}
The code only works when the "script" tag is in all lower-case, forming an incomplete denylist (CWE-184). Equivalent tags such as "SCRIPT" or "ScRiPt" will not be neutralized by this method, allowing an XSS attack.

Mitigations & Prevention

Implementation

Resolve all input to absolute or canonical representations before processing.

Implementation

Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We often

Implementation

Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even

Implementation

With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.

Implementation Defense in Depth

To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologi

Real-World CVE Examples

CVE IDDescription
CVE-2002-0738XSS using "&={script}".

Taxonomy Mappings

  • PLOVER: — Alternate XSS syntax
  • Software Fault Patterns: SFP24 — Tainted input to command

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CWE-87?

CWE-87 (Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax) is a software weakness identified by MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration. It is classified as a Variant-level weakness. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controlled input for alternate script syntax.

How can CWE-87 be exploited?

Attackers can exploit CWE-87 (Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax) to read application data, execute unauthorized code or commands. This weakness is typically introduced during the Implementation phase of software development.

How do I prevent CWE-87?

Key mitigations include: Resolve all input to absolute or canonical representations before processing.

What is the severity of CWE-87?

CWE-87 is classified as a Variant-level weakness (Low-Medium abstraction). It has been observed in 1 real-world CVEs.